Search for: "David Joslin" Results 1 - 15 of 15
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Late last month, a federal trial court in Texas issued a nationwide order preventing the federal Department of Education (DOE), as well as a number of other federal agencies, from enforcing—anywhere in the country—their “interpretation of the definition of ‘sex’ in the various written directives … as applied to Title IX … and Title VII” (which are federal laws that prohibit certain entities from discriminating on the basis of sex). [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Joslin, Amici Curiae Brief of Family Law Professors in Obergefell v. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Some Preliminary Thoughts, [Abstract], 51 Texas International Law Journal 213-228 (2016).David L. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 12:29 pm
Louis); Marion Crain (North Carolina); Karen Czapanskiy (Maryland); Patricia Dilley (Florida-Levin); Linda Fentiman (Pace); Zanita Fenton (Miami); Marjorie Florestal (McGeorge); Kaaryn Gustafson (Connecticut); Angela Harris (UC-Berkeley); Cynthia Hawkins-Leon (Stetson); Tanya Hernandez (GW); Elizabeth Hillman (Rutgers-Camden); Emma Coleman Jordan (Georgetown); Courtney Joslin (UC-Davis); Sylvia Kang'ara (Washington); Lisa Kelly (Washington); Laura Kessler (Utah); Martha McCluskey… [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 2:25 pm by Bridget Crawford
Panelist: David Gurnhan, Southampton Law School Commentator: Jamie Abrams 3. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 6:52 am by Bexis
PARISIAN TRANSCRIPTS 2.0 We had a number of people send us material after our first post with out list of deposition transcripts (and various other items) concerning the testimony of the extremely active plaintiffs’ side expert, Dr. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 5:00 am by Bexis
With Bexis and McConnell now at Reed Smith, we’ve gained access to Reed’s database on the ubiquitous plaintiffs’ expert Dr. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am by admin
The Interplay between the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause and the Fifth Amendment’s Takings Clause: Is the Supreme Court’s Test for “Public Use” Merely Rational Basis? [read post]